Categories: NewsPower Generation

KEPCO Caught Out Favouring Chaebol in Cheap Power Deals

The Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) is under fire for selling electricity at a price cheaper than its cost of production to multiple conglomerates. The Board of Audit (BAI) yesterday presented its audit report conducted from Sept. 20 to Nov. 23 last year into nine state-run corporations, including KEPCO and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

According to the report, KEPCO sold the electricity used in industrial sites of the country’s largest conglomerates at about 85.8% lower than the production cost. It said that KEPCO should have received a total of 5.23 trillion won ($4.61 billion) for the electricity from the corporations.

The BAI said that KEPCO was operating such business loss in order to strengthen the competitiveness of those large conglomerates. It added that KEPCO should stop the practice because the ratio that the electricity accounts for in conglomerates’ total manufacturing cost is only about 1.17% as of 2011, down from 1.94% in 1995.

The BAI said that selling electricity at night is also a problem. KEPCO offers electricity at a discounted price in order to increase the effectiveness of operating coal generators. But since too many conglomerates use night time electricity, it often experienced power shortages at night, making them operate oil and gas generators that create more expensive production costs to meet the demand.

The BAI said that the night time power used by conglomerates was sold at a 34-37% discounted price, incurring about 1.97 trillion won losses for KEPCO. From July 2011, the government started implementing a policy that charges more for electricity when the energy cost for raw material increases, but KEPCO never applied the policy to the conglomerates.

Due to the unprofitable business practices, KEPCO’s sizable debt has been rapidly mounting. It was 31.1 trillion won in debt as of 2011, up from 14.6 trillion won in 2007.

The average amount of power being used in residential areas is only half that of other OECD countries, KEPCO said, but the total energy consumption is 1.75 times higher than the OECD average, meaning that a smaller amount of power is being used in residential areas. But almost twice as much power is being spent at industrial sites compared to the OECD average. The BAI notified the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to apply the appropriate electricity bills to conglomerates and also to adjust the night time electricity cost.

Pimagazine Asia Admin

Recent Posts

Insuring Wind Turbines, What is the Risk?

Gallagher Re has shed light on the significant challenges insurers face when providing coverage for…

8 months ago

ARENA Start Feasibility Study in Western Australia

The Australian government will disburse AUD 1.7 million (USD 1.1m/EUR 1m) in grant funding to…

8 months ago

Asia moving away from Solar?

GlobalData’s latest report, ‘Asia Pacific Renewable Energy Policy Handbook 2024’ is among the latest region-specific…

8 months ago

Asia’s Energy Challenge 2024

The electrical generation market is facing a number of challenges, including the need to increase…

8 months ago

Powering Progress: Nuclear Energy’s Role in Asia’s Energy Landscape

Nuclear energy has emerged as a prominent player in Asia's energy landscape, offering a reliable…

1 year ago

Charting a Cleaner Path: Carbon Capture and Storage in Asia

The pursuit of a low-carbon future has gained significant momentum globally, and Asia stands tall…

1 year ago